HomeAboutContact
News & Discussion » Cisco May Have Lost iPhone Trademark in 2006 « Next post  |  Previous post »
Recent Articles
Latest Comments
Goonie - Aug 29, 2008 5:21 am
Wow really detail tutorial to jailbreak our iPhone. is it will be... (View comment)
» How to Jailbreak Your iPhone in Under a Minute
mariachi82 - Aug 29, 2008 2:45 am
So basically Gina, Apple forces people to wait... (View comment)
» Android vs. iPhone: Will the Google Phone be an iPhone Killer?
wayne - Aug 29, 2008 1:38 am
a great place that will repair water damaged or any other type... (View comment)
» iPhone Glass Cracked After Drop: Will it Cost Me?
Sheila - Aug 28, 2008 11:24 am
anther clarification: And NOW it’s stuck just as firm as the rest. (the... (View comment)
» iPhone Invisible Shield Review
Sheila - Aug 28, 2008 11:23 am
Clarification: I made my own solution with a drop of soap in about 1/4 c water. (View comment)
» iPhone Invisible Shield Review
Popular Articles

Subscribe to blog

Get email updates

About Chris

I'm not an iPhone news company. I'm just an iPhone owner with a critical eye. Read more.

Sections
Photostream
via flickr
More of my photos
Jan 12, 2007 | By Chris | Tags:
RSS Sick of the same old regurgitated iPhone news? Subscribe to Apple iPhone Review for fresh insights, accessory reviews, and iPhone how-to's.

Public papers from the US Patent and Trademark office may help prove that Cisco Systems lost the iPhone trademark last year, according to Jay Behmke, a trademark law attorney at CMPR.

Cisco did not sign the required Declaration of Use - which states “that you have been using the trademark continuously” in the past six years - until four days before the end of a six-month grace period granted to companies who miss the deadline.

And here’s a photo (thanks to Ed Burnette of ZDNet) that shows the required “copy of a label or other packaging showing the trademark in use” that Cisco sent to the US Patent and Trademark office:

Cisco iPhone Declaration of Use

The word “iPhone” is stickered on to the box, and there is no mention of it visible anywhere on the packaging.

Burnette said if Apple can prove in court that “Cisco did not actively offer a product named ‘iPhone’ between 1999 and December 2006,” then Cisco’s registration could be cancelled, and you can score one for Apple.

Related articles:

Be the First to Comment

« Apple Threatens to Sue Over... Cisco Sues Apple Over iPhone... »